| |
|
|
Graphic Design: Web Developers Forum
04-27-2005, 06:23 PM
|
#1
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 182
|
Fonts
|
|
|
|
04-27-2005, 06:37 PM
|
#2
|
|
TalkWebDev Junior
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2005, 06:40 PM
|
#3
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 182
|
There aren't that many Zelda fonts :-(. 'tis a great shame.
:: tries to be more active ::
A good font can make or break a signature or image.
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2005, 11:28 PM
|
#4
|
|
TalkWebDev Junior
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Archaic Sage
A good font can make or break a signature or image.
|
A whole site sometimes! 
I didn't know of the first site you mentioned Archaic, thanks for that. But yeah, choosing a suitable font for a design is necessary and mainting a good variety of fonts is also another necessity for a designer. |
|
|
|
|
05-26-2005, 07:15 PM
|
#5
|
|
TalkWebDev Junior
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
|
But. When it comes to fonts... The one who sees the font has to have the same font on his/her computer! If not, it would most probably just become arial or another basic font....
There are a way to embed fonts. But I dont know it...
You can add fonts to pictures... Then they would look similar in any browser/computer...
Remember! wysiwyg is wysiwyg, not wysiwog
What you see is what you get......
NOT
What you see is what others get...
But certainly. Fonts are great.
|
|
|
|
|
05-29-2005, 10:23 AM
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 103
|
Godteri: That's why, if you're using fancy fonts, you always use them as a part of an image or graphic, not the font directly.
You should really never use fancy fonts directly as text on a site, as the chances are big that the viewer doesn't have the font.
|
|
|
|
|
05-29-2005, 03:14 PM
|
#7
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 182
|
Yep, I never use any fonts par the default on my website if it's text, as it would just look like Arial most of the time for most people anyway. Images are the most important part for fancy text.
|
|
|
|
|
05-30-2005, 05:12 PM
|
#8
|
|
TalkWebDev Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 26
|
Yeah - Like Lars and Archaic Sage said, when using fancy fonts, you had better use them as part of graphics, or the results won't be seen to the average user either way.
Personally, I'm a big fan of simple, curvy fonts. They make excellent choices for use in logos especially.
__________________
At your service.
|
|
|
|
|
05-30-2005, 05:52 PM
|
#9
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 182
|
I'm in love with one called Viking at the moment. It's very strong and dynamic.
|
|
|
|
|
05-30-2005, 10:23 PM
|
#10
|
|
TalkWebDev Junior
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
|
But....
I thought that was what i said....
Stupid me... Never making myself clear enough...
The wysiwig ≠Wysiwog is a good rule though...
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:45 PM.
|
 |
 |
|
|
